SuperCom Ltd.

Criminal justice systems in many countries face persistent structural pressures that strain public resources and limit flexibility in how authorities supervise offenders. These challenges drive government demand for electronic monitoring programs as alternatives to full incarceration.

Source: Company Documents

Recidivism remains a central problem. In the United States, approximately 75 percent of released prisoners are rearrested within five years. High recidivism rates place repeated demands on courts, law enforcement, and correctional facilities while raising concerns about community safety. Programs that support structured reentry and ongoing supervision can reduce reoffense rates, and electronic monitoring provides a mechanism for maintaining oversight after release.

Source: Company Documents

Prison overcrowding compounds the challenge. The United States has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world at 571 prisoners per 100,000 inhabitants, and many facilities operate above designed capacity. Overcrowded prisons strain resources, complicate facility management, and limit the ability of correctional systems to house additional offenders. Electronic monitoring allows jurisdictions to supervise lower-risk individuals in the community, preserving prison capacity for higher-risk cases.

Source: Company Documents

Cost differences between incarceration and community supervision are substantial. Operating prisons in the United States costs more than $80 billion annually, with per-prisoner expenses averaging approximately $36,500 per year. House arrest with electronic monitoring costs roughly $2,900 per person annually, which represents a reduction of more than 90 percent. For governments balancing public safety with budget constraints, electronic monitoring offers a way to maintain supervision at a fraction of the cost of incarceration.

These dynamics have fueled growth in the electronic monitoring market. Industry estimates per Berg Insight data place the global market at approximately $1.6 billion in 2023, growing to $2.3 billion by 2028 at a compound annual growth rate of 7.2 percent. North America represents the largest regional market, followed by Europe and Latin America. High barriers to entry, including the need for five to ten years of industry experience to qualify for government tenders, limit the field to approximately ten global providers capable of competing across multiple continents.

Source: Company Documents

Electronic monitoring programs allow authorities to supervise individuals both within correctional facilities and outside of prison while enforcing court-ordered conditions. These programs rely on a combination of wearable devices, home-based equipment, and software platforms that collect data and alert authorities when violations occur. Governments use electronic monitoring to apply different levels of supervision based on legal requirements and assessed risk.

Source: Company Documents

One common use case is house arrest. Under house arrest, an individual must remain at a specific residence except during approved periods. A monitoring device confirms presence at the location and records any unauthorized departures. Courts and correctional agencies often use house arrest for pretrial supervision, sentencing alternatives, or early release programs.

GPS monitoring applies when authorities need to track an individual’s movement in real time. GPS stands for Global Positioning System, a satellite-based technology that determines location. GPS monitoring allows agencies to define approved zones and restricted areas, such as exclusion zones around schools or victims’ residences. Alerts notify authorities if an individual enters or leaves designated locations.

Domestic violence monitoring focuses on enhancing victim’s safety rather than general location tracking. These programs typically involve monitoring both the offender and the protected individual. If the monitored person approaches a restricted distance from the victim, the system can trigger alerts for authorities and, in some cases, the victim. The goal is early warning and rapid response rather than punishment after the fact.

Electronic monitoring programs may also include alcohol monitoring and rehabilitation-focused supervision. Alcohol monitoring uses wearable sensors to detect alcohol consumption and automatically report violations. Rehabilitation programs combine monitoring with structured schedules, reporting requirements, and communication tools that support compliance with treatment or reintegration plans.

Across all program types, electronic monitoring systems depend on continuous data collection, automated alerts, and oversight by public agencies. Authorities use this information to enforce conditions, respond to violations, and document compliance over time. These programs provide a practical framework for governments to supervise individuals outside prison while maintaining accountability and public safety.

SuperCom delivers electronic monitoring through an integrated set of devices, software platforms, and support services designed for government supervision programs. Rather than offering a single product, the company provides a system that combines wearable technology with cloud-based monitoring tools and communication capabilities.

At the center of SuperCom’s platform is PureMonitor, a cloud-based system that collects and processes data from devices worn by monitored individuals. PureMonitor allows authorities to track location data, receive alerts, and manage monitoring programs across different use cases. Agencies use this platform to review compliance information and respond when conditions are violated.

SuperCom supports home-based monitoring through PureCom, base-station equipment installed at a residence that works with wearable devices to confirm whether an individual is present at approved locations. These systems are commonly used for house arrest and curfew-based programs, where location confirmation is tied to a fixed address.

For wearable technology, SuperCom offers multiple device types designed for different monitoring needs. PureOne is a single-piece tracking device intended to reduce complexity for monitored individuals. PureTag is a compact radio-frequency bracelet for proximity-based monitoring, while PureTrack provides GPS-based tracking when continuous location data is required. These devices operate continuously and transmit data back to the monitoring platform.

Source: Company Documents

Certain SuperCom solutions also include two-way communication, biometric authentication, and video calling capabilities, depending on program requirements. These features allow authorities to confirm identity, conduct remote check-ins, and communicate directly with monitored individuals as part of supervision.

Together, these components form the PureSecurity Suite, a flexible system that supports multiple electronic monitoring programs within a single jurisdiction. Governments can deploy different combinations of devices and software based on program rules, legal requirements, and supervision goals, using a common technology foundation across use cases.

SuperCom works exclusively with government agencies responsible for public safety, criminal justice, and corrections. Its customers include national, state, and local authorities that supervise individuals under court-ordered conditions. These agencies select electronic monitoring providers through formal procurement processes and typically award multi-year contracts.

Government electronic monitoring contracts follow a structured lifecycle. Agencies issue requests for proposals outlining program requirements, and qualified providers submit competitive bids. Once awarded, contracts move through a deployment phase involving device provisioning, system customization, and staff training before entering an operational period that can span five to fifteen years. This structure favors providers with established track records, technical reliability, and the capacity to support large-scale deployments over extended periods.

SuperCom has served more than 100,000 individuals worldwide through monitoring programs for government customers across EMEA and North America. Since 2016, the company has won more than 15 national electronic monitoring projects globally. Many of these contracts cover multiple program types simultaneously, such as home detention, GPS tracking, and domestic violence monitoring, with thousands of individuals enrolled at any given time.

Source: Company Documents

The company’s geographic footprint spans EMEA and North America. In California, SuperCom operates through Leaders in Community Alternatives (LCA), a subsidiary acquired in 2016 with more than 30 years of experience serving government agencies. This combination of established relationships and newer market entries reflects a customer base that values operational continuity, innovation, and long-term service capability.

SuperCom generates revenue through long-term electronic monitoring contracts with government agencies. These contracts follow a structured process that begins with competitive bidding and extends through deployment and ongoing service delivery.

Source: Company Documents

The process starts with a request for proposal (RFP), a formal document issued by a government agency that outlines program requirements and invites qualified companies to submit bids. SuperCom collects program data, submits a proposal, negotiates pricing and terms, and, if selected, signs a contract before launching the monitoring program. The competitive bid phase typically takes three to twenty-four months.

Once a contract is awarded, SuperCom deploys its monitoring systems over a defined rollout period. This phase includes manufacturing or supplying monitoring devices, customizing systems for the customer, training staff, and enrolling monitored individuals. Deployment typically takes three to twelve months, depending on program size and complexity.

After deployment, revenue is generated on a recurring basis. SuperCom leases hardware to customers and provides cloud-based software-as-a-service. Revenue is earned per monitored individual, with the industry average running approximately $2,900 annually per enrollee for technology and complimentary services. Contracts typically run five to fifteen years, creating recurring revenue streams tied to long-term government relationships rather than one-time equipment sales.

Because SuperCom operates within regulated public-sector procurement frameworks, revenue growth depends on winning new contracts, expanding enrollment within existing programs, and maintaining service performance over time. The first nine months of 2025 produced EBITDA margins of approximately 35 percent, reflecting the operating leverage inherent in a recurring-revenue model with an established contract base.

SuperCom’s growth strategy centers on expanding its electronic monitoring business through government contracts in both existing and new markets. The company pursues large-scale public-sector projects, deepens its presence in jurisdictions where it already operates, and extends its geographic reach through partnerships and acquisitions.

Source: Company Documents

In Europe, SuperCom targets national-level electronic monitoring programs that cover entire countries and often involve multiple use cases, including home detention, GPS tracking, and domestic violence monitoring. The company has historically achieved win rates exceeding 65 percent in competitive European national government tenders, and it continues to pursue large contracts as they come up for renewal or rebid. Recent national project wins include Romania ($33M), Germany ($7M), Finland ($3.6M), Israel, Croatia, and multiple Swedish deployments.

In the United States, SuperCom accelerated its expansion beginning in mid-2024. Since then, the company has secured more than 35 new contracts across 15 states through a combination of direct bids and partnerships with regional service providers. Its California subsidiary, Leaders in Community Alternatives (LCA), provides an established operational base with more than 30 years of experience serving government agencies in that state. Partnerships with regional providers support expansion into areas where local presence and operational familiarity matter for program deployment.

Source: Company Documents

SuperCom also considers acquisitions of electronic monitoring service providers as part of its expansion strategy to strengthen market presence and operational scale in targeted regions. The company continues to invest in product development and sales capabilities to support these efforts, aiming to shorten government sales cycles and improve competitive positioning across domestic and international markets.

SuperCom reports financial results related to its electronic monitoring and public safety activities in periodic filings and earnings releases. For fiscal year 2024, SuperCom reported revenue of $27.6 million and EBITDA of $6.3 million. 

The information below reflects selected historical figures for recent reporting periods.

Source: Company Documents

For the first nine months of 2025, SuperCom reported net income of $6.0 million and non-GAAP earnings per share of $2.17. For the trailing twelve-month period ended in the third quarter of 2025, the company reported EBITDA of $8.9 million and a 33% EBITDA margin.

Source: Company Documents

For the first nine months of 2025, the company reported revenue of $20.4 million, gross profit of $12.5 million, net income of $6.0 million, and EBITDA of $7.2 million.

As of September 30, 2025, SuperCom reported cash and restricted cash of $13.1 million, total assets of $67.8 million, and total liabilities of $21.3 million.

SuperCom is led by an executive team with experience in electronic monitoring, public safety operations, technology development, and government contracting. The company’s leadership oversees product development, service delivery, and commercial execution across its government-focused business.

Ordan Trabelsi, President and Chief Executive Officer

Ordan Trabelsi has served as President and Chief Executive Officer since February 2021. He joined SuperCom in 2013 and previously led the company’s business and operations in the Americas through leadership roles at SuperCom Inc. and Leaders in Community Alternatives. His background includes overseeing U.S. operations and participating in multiple company financings. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Software and Electrical Engineering from the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology and an MBA from Columbia University Business School.

Barak Trabelsi, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer

Barak Trabelsi joined SuperCom in 2013 as Director of New Products Development. He later served as Vice President of Product Development, and EVP & GM of the Internet of Things division before becoming Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer in 2020. His experience includes product development, wireless technologies, and large-scale system deployment. He previously held senior product and research roles at Equinox Ltd. and Sigma Wave. He holds a Bachelor’s degree in Computer and Business studies and an MBA from Tel Aviv University.

This communication is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of an offer to buy, nor a recommendation of any securities of the company mentioned herein.

SuperCom Ltd. (the “Company”) and its counsel have reviewed the content of this page as well as the accompanying presentation (“Company Presentation”) displayed on this page. To the best of its knowledge, the Company does not believe this content to be misleading or inaccurate in any material respect, nor does it believe there are any material omissions with respect to such content. The Company does not believe the contents of the page or the Company Presentation to contain any non-public material information.

Information and opinions presented in the Company Presentation are provided by the Company, and B2i Digital makes no representation as to their accuracy or completeness. The information contained on this page is not intended to constitute any form of advice, and the information provided is not intended to provide a sufficient basis on which to make an investment decision. It is not investment research, nor does it constitute a research recommendation, as it does not constitute substantive research or analysis. This information is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. 

Information, opinions and estimates contained on this page or in the Company Presentation reflect judgments by the Company as of the original date of publication by the Company and are subject to change without notice. Past performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied is made regarding future performance.

A complete description of the risks and uncertainties relating to the Company and its securities can be found in the company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission available for free at www.sec.gov.

Information on this page may relate to penny stocks, which may also be referred to as low-priced stocks. Penny stocks are low-priced shares typically issued by small companies. Penny stocks involve greater than normal risk, they may be less liquid than other stocks (i.e., more difficult to sell), and there may be less reliable information available regarding such stocks. Investors in penny stocks should be prepared for the possibility that they may lose their entire investment.

B2i Digital or its related entities may own securities of the Company. To comply with Rule 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, B2i Digital must provide full disclosure of all compensation received for investor awareness services provided by the Company.

The Company is a client of B2i Digital. The Company agreed to pay B2i Digital no greater than $100,000 in cash for 12 months of digital marketing consulting and investor awareness services.